beholdmydemons: (anger - call bull)
Walter ([personal profile] beholdmydemons) wrote2014-04-18 06:42 am

twelfth fusion - text (backdated to 4/17)

Far be it from me to turn down a challenge you miserable runt. [....Well, that's...promising.]

Here friends, what do you think of this? There's no such thing as birthright that's recognized by nature, and it's a notion the weak use as a trick to keep themselves in power they didn't earn. To hear a person claiming they're you're better when it's clear they're helpless on their own, that's plain foolishness, isn't it? And yet there's worlds where such ineffectual men are kings and the people are made to believe that it's natural and just for the throne to grant power alone. And they suffer for it because when the king is weak he must resort to underhanded means to ensure nobody's more powerful than him.

But that doesn't have a damn thing to do with this world because it doesn't work like that here. So who else thinks that anyone who crows about their title in this world is only fooling themselves? Pokemon give power where it's earned by effort or skill. Where it's not, the unfit can't rise to where anyone would suffer beneath them. And the rest of us are free to show them their natural place when they think their hollow claims to good breeding make them any better than another. A place in a pool, for example.


[...That should probably offer a clue to what this unabashed craziness is about, if the fact that it goes up about ten minutes after a post from Saionji doesn't give it enough context. I'm...I'm sorry, guys.]


[[ooc: [personal profile] bertall will be hosting the Totodile/Skorupi/Joltik egg post tonight - thanks, Danny!]]
paladinlost: (err)

[video]

[personal profile] paladinlost 2014-04-19 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
I've never met ineffectual kings before, whether their title came from birth or merit, and I know plenty of them. But a throne, or its closest equivalent in a country without a monarchy, does grant great power, if only the power to make people listen to you before they complain about a change in tax laws. Not that it matters at all in this world, indeed. Here one can see children outbattle high-ranking adults with ease.
paladinlost: (thoughtful)

[video]

[personal profile] paladinlost 2014-04-19 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
If the king happens to not be fit and cause suffering to his people, he simply needs to replaced. A talented recognized heir is ideal, as those come with pre-existing popular acknowledgement and stability, but a more violent change can do in a pinch.

[He says it so simply only because his own unfit king turned out to be a fake. Makes killing him much easier.]
paladinlost: (confused)

[video]

[personal profile] paladinlost 2014-04-19 02:59 am (UTC)(link)
The best way to counter that lack of knowledge would be to encourage education for all, along with popular interest in the welfare of the country. Which is exactly what an unfit king would want to avoid, but well-educated older generations would counter that. ...Unless a country is afflicted with a series of long-lived bad kings, which would be terrifyingly unlucky.

[Or commonplace in certain worlds, perhaps, but Cecil really doesn't want to know about those.]
paladinlost: (soft)

[video]

[personal profile] paladinlost 2014-04-19 06:31 pm (UTC)(link)
That's only because I've seen plenty of good examples of rulers.

[And he's hoping he's also one.]

You'd need someone coming from a different system to plant a seed, perhaps. But that does leave you dependent on others, which comes with its own share of problems.
paladinlost: (thoughtful)

[video]

[personal profile] paladinlost 2014-04-21 12:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Help from an outsider could be seen as foreign interference, which always gets strong nationalists up in arms. And you've have to be absolutely certain that the help is altruistic, and not from someone with hidden motives that might not have your country's best interests in mind.